Pages

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Nokia Showing Support for Permanent Injunctions - Blog 11


Patent Case
Nokia has lots of experience with patent litigation. It owns over 10,000 patents and had to protect these patents on many occasions. This includes settled patent instigation with Apple and Google. Plus, Nokia is attempting to have the courts be more responsive to patent holders needs, like themselves. This will in affect increase peoples’ ability to once again innovate and not worry about unprotected patents. Nokia will do this by increasing the courts ability to pass permanent injunctions, which is a complete stop of business activities for the patent infringers after a case is complete.

 Now Nokia is attempting to submit an ‘amicus brief’ (adding official testimony) with Apple and against Samsung. This case was ruled by Koh’s in mid-December, 2012 where apple won the patent infringement case against the Galaxy tab 10.1, Galaxy nexus smartphone, and others. However, judge Koh could not put forth a permanent injunction because in eBay v. MercExchange, and Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Mfg. Corp made it nearly impossible for permanent injunctions to be passed. Nokia is trying to prove that because of these cases the court has diverged from its point of order by taking into consideration demand for the product, which is not part of patent law. Nokia has a strong point and if passed will have major implication on innovation, the economy, and patent wars.   


http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/03/nokia-files-amicus-brief-supporting.html

4 comments:

  1. Nokia's decision to provide a supportive legal opinion in Apple's appeal is pretty surprising in that they're helping their competitor. But, I guess in the grand scheme of things, they see the obligatory licensing structure as a bigger problem than Apple winning another case. Cool write up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice touch with the picture, Dove! Getting an injunction would be huge as all production relating to the patent in question would be put to a halt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. great sharing! whether or not they could get an injunction would mean a lot to other industry leaders taking part in patent wars

    ReplyDelete
  4. This injunction, as well as the amicus brief, could be a good turning point in patent law

    ReplyDelete